ArticleBrain structure & function2026
Sex differences modulate olfactory bulb volume-function relationships but not olfactory training-induced plasticity.
Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Men typically display larger olfactory bulb (OB) volumes, while women demonstrate superior olfactory performance. Olfactory training (OT) has been shown to induce structural changes in OB, but whether sex influences OT-related plasticity remains unclear. This study aimed to examine how sex differences modulate OB volume-function relationships and OT-related OB neuroplasticity. Participants included 27 women and 11 men with acquired olfactory dysfunction who underwent Sniffin' Sticks Test and T2-weighted MRI before and after a 12-week OT program of twice-daily exposure to four odorants. OB volume was measured by ITK-SNAP. Pooled baseline analysis revealed no significant correlation between OB volume and composite threshold-discrimination-identification (TDI) score. Women showed a significant correlation between baseline OB volume and TDI on both sides (left: r = 0.458, p = 0.016; right: r = 0.413, p = 0.032), whereas no significant associations were observed in men. Following OT, the overall sample showed bilateral OB volume increases (left: mean difference = 4.70 ± 2.16, p = 0.036; right: mean difference = 5.64 ± 1.91, p = 0.005) and improvements in odor discrimination (t = 2.12, p = 0.040) and composite TDI score (t = 2.13, p = 0.040). Men consistently presented larger OB volumes (F(1, 36) = 6.63, p = 0.014), and no sex-by-session interaction effects were observed. It appears that sex can mask cross-sectional associations between OB volume and olfactory performance, supporting sex-aware analysis when interpreting baseline OB morphometry. In contrast, OT elicits comparable OB volume increases across sexes, suggesting a similar pattern of training-induced structural plasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.