ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026
Supreme nasal conchae in human cadavers: prevalence, morphometry, and a new classification proposal.
Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExtranumerary nasal conchae, including the supreme nasal concha (SupNC) and Zuckerkandl's concha (ZC), are uncommon variants relevant to endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery, yet their prevalence and morphometry remain poorly defined. No cadaveric study has simultaneously evaluated prevalence, detailed morphometry, and a data-driven SupNC classification using principal component analysis (PCA). This study determined SupNC prevalence in cadavers and proposed a clinically oriented classification integrating morphological and quantitative parameters. MATERIAL AND
methodsA cross-sectional cadaveric study analyzed 59 hemisections with preserved nasal conchae. Conchae were counted, and SupNCs classified according to Orhan and a new system. Morphometry was obtained using digital calipers and ImageJ.
resultsOf 59 hemisections, 37 (63%) had three conchae, 21 (35%) four, and 1 (2%) five. SupNC was present in 22/59 (37.3%) and ZC in 1/59 (1.7%), associated with SupNC. Significant differences were found between hemisections with and without extranumerary conchae in middle concha area (3.68 ± 1.07 vs. 4.45 ± 1.20 mm
conclusionSupNC was relatively common, whereas ZC was rare. The proposed morphology- and morphometry-based classification may improve preoperative CT evaluation and intraoperative orientation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.