Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207303›Full record

ArticleSurgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA2026

Supreme nasal conchae in human cadavers: prevalence, morphometry, and a new classification proposal.

Mauro Bezerra Montello, Sofia Helyeth Ramirez Cardenas, Themístocles da Silva Negreiros Neto, Gabriel Vitório de Araújo Suassuna, Wigínio Gabriel Lira-Bandeira, Ingrid C Landfald, Łukasz Olewnik, Judney Cley Cavalcante, Bento João Abreu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mauro Bezerra Montello *Group of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil. mauro.montello@ufrn.br.
Sofia Helyeth Ramirez Cardenas *Group of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.
Themístocles da Silva Negreiros NetoGroup of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.
Gabriel Vitório de Araújo SuassunaGroup of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.
Wigínio Gabriel Lira-BandeiraGroup of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.
Ingrid C LandfaldDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Mazovian Academy in Płock, Płock, Poland.
Łukasz OlewnikDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Mazovian Academy in Płock, Płock, Poland.
Judney Cley CavalcanteGroup of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.
Bento João AbreuGroup of Study and Research in Human Anatomy (NEPAH), Laboratory of Human Anatomy, Department of Morphology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Universitary Campus, Av Salgado Filho S/N, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-900, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExtranumerary nasal conchae, including the supreme nasal concha (SupNC) and Zuckerkandl's concha (ZC), are uncommon variants relevant to endoscopic sinus and skull base surgery, yet their prevalence and morphometry remain poorly defined. No cadaveric study has simultaneously evaluated prevalence, detailed morphometry, and a data-driven SupNC classification using principal component analysis (PCA). This study determined SupNC prevalence in cadavers and proposed a clinically oriented classification integrating morphological and quantitative parameters. MATERIAL AND

methodsA cross-sectional cadaveric study analyzed 59 hemisections with preserved nasal conchae. Conchae were counted, and SupNCs classified according to Orhan and a new system. Morphometry was obtained using digital calipers and ImageJ.

resultsOf 59 hemisections, 37 (63%) had three conchae, 21 (35%) four, and 1 (2%) five. SupNC was present in 22/59 (37.3%) and ZC in 1/59 (1.7%), associated with SupNC. Significant differences were found between hemisections with and without extranumerary conchae in middle concha area (3.68 ± 1.07 vs. 4.45 ± 1.20 mm

conclusionSupNC was relatively common, whereas ZC was rare. The proposed morphology- and morphometry-based classification may improve preoperative CT evaluation and intraoperative orientation.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationTurbinatesAgedAged, 80 and overCadaverCross-Sectional StudiesEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePrincipal Component AnalysisEndoscopic sinus surgeryEthmoid boneNasal turbinatesPrincipal component analysisSupreme nasal conchaZuckerkandl’s concha

Identifiers

PMID42207303
PMCPMC13219204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.