Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207298›Full record

ArticleResearch on child and adolescent psychopathology2026

How Teens Imagine Tomorrow: Hopelessness and Suicidality Across Latent Classes of Episodic Future Thinking.

Rachel J Nam, Christine B Cha

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Research on child and adolescent psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rachel J NamDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 W 120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA. rjn2127@tc.columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1095-9900
Christine B ChaDepartment of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, Teachers College, Columbia University, 525 W 120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3598-4092

Funding

Prospection in suicidal teens: Identifying a novel and malleable cognitive risk factorR15MH113076 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY TEACHERS COLLEGE · PI GABA, AYORKOR · 2018 to 2023
$870k
NIMH NIH HHS R15 MH113076
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Episodic future thinking (EFT), the mental projection of oneself forward in time to pre-experience a future event, is an everyday yet consequential cognitive process relevant for hopelessness and suicidal ideation (SI). Despite its multifaceted nature, no study has examined patterns of various EFT characteristics among hopeless and suicidal individuals, particularly youth. This secondary analysis of Cha et al. (2024) adopted for the first time a person-centered approach to identify four latent classes, each, of positive and negative EFT among 151 community-based adolescents based on subjective characteristics of their imagined future events. Positive and negative EFT classes were distinguished by different subjective characteristics. Imagining less vivid positive future events with emotional detachment statistically predicted higher hopelessness at baseline. Imagining negative future events with a perseverative quality (i.e., previously imagined, ambiguous in likelihood) predicted higher SI severity both at baseline and 6 months later. Our findings suggest positive and negative EFT are not mere opposites of each other, and the relationship between EFT and psychological outcomes may depend on the particular features assessed.

Indexed as

HopeImaginationSuicidal IdeationThinkingAdolescentFemaleHumansAdolescentsCognitionEpisodic future thinkingSuicide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.