ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Combination treatment with mitoxantrone and doxorubicin induces multidrug resistance in Ewing Sarcoma CDX reporter xenografts.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ewing Sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive malignancy with limited treatment options in advanced disease. This study aimed to identify efficacious therapeutic candidates from FDA-approved drugs via in silico screening and evaluate the potential of the top candidate, mitoxantrone (Mito), alone and in combination with standard-of-care doxorubicin (Doxo). In silico screening was performed against an ES-specific molecular expression profile. Mito was validated in ES in vitro cellular models, and combination effects with Doxo were assessed by cytotoxicity assays. In vivo efficacy was evaluated in ES cell-line-derived xenograft (CDX) reporter models, with MDR1 (ABCB1) expression quantified across treatment arms to assess multidrug resistance. Mito demonstrated significant in vitro cytotoxicity, and Mito + Doxo produced an additive effect. However, in vivo CDX models showed no significant tumor response improvement with combination treatment relative to monotherapies. Combination-treated xenografts showed increased tumorigenicity, while monotherapy arms showed significant antitumor efficacy. MDR1 expression was markedly elevated in combination-treated tumors, indicating an acquired multidrug-resistant phenotype. This study reveals a critical in vitro and in vivo discordance and suggests that Mito + Doxo co-administration may paradoxically induce multidrug resistance, abrogating backbone chemotherapy efficacy. These findings urge caution in preclinical combination strategies involving standard-of-care agents and underscore the need for further investigation prior to clinical translation in ES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.