ReviewClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Timely hospital discharge in TAVI patients: towards a patient-centered care pathway.
Review in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved into the dominant therapeutic option for severe aortic stenosis, with procedural refinements and expanding indications increasingly supporting shorter post-procedural monitoring and discharge. International evidence from randomized trials, multi-center registries, and consensus guidelines demonstrates that reduced length of stay (LOS), including next-day or early discharge, can be safely achieved in selected patients when supported by standardized workflows, careful patient selection, and structured outpatient monitoring. In Germany, LOS remains among the longest in Europe, driven by structural, reimbursement, and cultural barriers. With increasing TAVI volumes, demographic pressures, and workforce constraints, these barriers inhibit health system sustainability, procedural capacity, and patient experience. Early discharge below the currently defined thresholds often results in financial disadvantages under the Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) reimbursement mechanism, thereby disincentivizing standardized adoption and pathway innovation. Yet, a reduction in LOS would yield meaningful system-level advantages, including increased procedural capacity, improved resource allocation, and lower post-procedural bed occupancy costs, all leading to better and more efficient patient pathways. This narrative, practice- and policy-oriented critical perspective evaluates the current German landscape and outlines pragmatic strategies to enable safe early discharge. It synthesizes relevant international evidence, identifies system-level barriers specific to Germany, and proposes a structured roadmap including: (1) standardized eligibility criteria, (2) protocolized peri- and post-procedural pathways, (3) pilot implementation in carefully selected centers with outcome reporting, and (4) reimbursement realignment to avoid wrong financial incentives. Supported by professional medical societies and aligned with international standards, early discharge pathways could enhance efficiency and improve patient-centered care, offering Germany a timely opportunity to modernize TAVI experience and delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207269What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.