ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Impact of Newborn CCHD Screening Using Pulse Oximetry in the United States.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) screening using pulse oximetry was mandated by all states between 2011-2018. We sought to evaluate the effect on the age at initial admission to a children's hospital, the hospital length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital mortality before and after pulse oximetry screening (POS) mandates. A multicenter retrospective cohort study of the Pediatric Health Information System was performed evaluating neonates with CCHD born at ≥34 weeks gestation admitted to a children's hospital after the first day of life. We evaluated changes before and after POS mandates in mean age at initial admission and LOS using interrupted time series (ITS) analysis to identify post-POS mandate level and trend changes. There was inadequate power to analyze in-hospital mortality rates with ITS or logistic regression. 12,298 neonates were included from 39 children's hospitals in 22 states and District of Columbia. After POS mandates, neonates tended to be admitted to children's hospitals earlier, with decreases in level (2.2 days; p<0.001) and trend (annual change: +5% to no change; p=0.03). Post-mandate neonates had longer mean LOS with a level increase of 6 days (p=0.03) and no significant change in trend. Descriptive data showed in-hospital mortality decreased from 7.5% pre-mandate to 6.6% post mandate across the cohort, but could not be further evaluated using ITS modeling. Subgroup analyses with only high sensitivity diagnoses and excluding outflow tract diagnoses yielded similar findings. POS mandates were associated with earlier age of initial admission to a children's hospital and increased hospital LOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207266What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.