Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207220›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

Early detection of gastrointestinal cancers in low- and middle-income countries: A risk-stratified framework and implementation roadmap.

Sudhir Maharshi, Prabhat Narain Sharma, Manasvin Sareen, Kamlesh Kumar Sharma, Rupesh Pokharna, Shyam Sunder Sharma, Shaneel Harsh, Noriya Uedo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sudhir MaharshiDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Room No. 218, Superspeciality Block, Jaipur, 302 004, India. sudhir.maharshi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0488-562X
Prabhat Narain SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, ESIC Medical College and Hospitals, Jaipur, 302 006, India.
Manasvin SareenDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Room No. 218, Superspeciality Block, Jaipur, 302 004, India.
Kamlesh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Room No. 218, Superspeciality Block, Jaipur, 302 004, India.
Rupesh PokharnaDepartment of Gastroenterology, SMS Medical College and Hospitals, Room No. 218, Superspeciality Block, Jaipur, 302 004, India.
Shyam Sunder SharmaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fortis Hospital, Jaipur, 302 017, India.
Shaneel HarshDepartment of Gastroenterology, Harsh Hospital, Purnea, 854 301, India.
Noriya UedoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low and middle-income countries (LMICs) like India bear a substantial burden of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer morbidity and mortality, largely attributable to late-stage diagnosis, which limits curative treatment options and drives poor survival outcomes. Although population-based endoscopic screening programs in East Asia have demonstrated significant mortality reduction, such approaches are not currently feasible in India due to population scale, heterogeneous infrastructure and workforce constraints. Consequently, India requires a pragmatic strategy focused on earlier detection within routine clinical practice. This review proposes a quality-first, phased framework for early GI cancer detection in India, emphasizing targeted screening and risk-based surveillance rather than population-wide endoscopic screening. High-quality conventional white light endoscopy (WLE) supported by adequate inspection time, systematic examination protocols, optimal mucosal preparation and objective quality metrics forms the foundational step, as most early GI neoplasia is detectable with optimized WLE. Image-enhanced endoscopy (IEE), including chromoendoscopy and digital optical technologies, is positioned as a complementary tool that provides incremental benefit when selectively deployed in quality-assured settings for high-risk populations and lesion characterization. Emerging Indian data demonstrates the feasibility of detecting early gastric cancer following structured training and systematic inspection, with curative endoscopic sub-mucosal dissection achievable in appropriately selected cases. However, widespread implementation faces barriers including equipment costs, training gaps, high procedural volumes, short inspection times and variable procedural quality. To address these challenges, a staged implementation roadmap is outlined: (1) adoption of risk-targeted screening in high-incidence regions and high-risk individuals; (2) standardization of endoscopic quality measures, including systematic inspection and minimum examination times; (3) integration of structured diagnostic training and selective IEE exposure into gastroenterology curricula and (4) expansion of access through hub-and-spoke networks, shared equipment models and low-cost chromoendoscopy in resource-limited settings. Coordinated action across clinicians, training programs, institutions, professional societies and policymakers is essential to transitioning GI cancer care in India from late-stage palliation toward early detection and curative endoscopic therapy.

Indexed as

ChromoendoscopyEarly detectionEndoscopic submucosal dissectionGastrointestinal cancerImage-enhanced endoscopyIndiaRisk-based screeningWhite light endoscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.