Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42207212›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2026

Patient Engagement Strategies for Implementing Evidence-Based Care in Atherosclerosis.

Emily E Brown, Kathleen Byrne

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily E BrownDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. ebrow102@jhmi.edu.
Kathleen ByrneDivision of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of the reviewDespite continuing therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease, it remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. The current challenge is not the development of therapeutics but rather patient engagement and compliance with medical recommendations. Here in this narrative expert review we discuss strategies to improve patient engagement in cardiovascular care. RECENT

findingsThere is a varying level of data surrounding different patient education strategies in the care of atherosclerosis. There are three main categories of interventions reviewed with evidence of efficacy: personalized and accessible patient education, digital health interventions, and implementation of personalized medicine via genetic testing. Implementing strategies in the clinic such as personalizededucation at an accessible health literacy level, digital health interventions,and even genetic testing may improve patient engagement and outcomes.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisEvidence-Based MedicinePatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationDigital HealthGenetic TestingHealth LiteracyHumansPrecision MedicineAtherosclerosisImplementation scienceMobile healthPatient engagementTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.