ArticleTropical animal health and production2026
Effects of ventilation type on the performance and welfare parameters of female pigs during summer and winter conditions.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the effects of mechanical (MV) and natural ventilation (NV) systems body weight (BW) and weight gain (WG), aggression and welfare indices of female grower pigs under Mediterranean summer and winter conditions. Sixty-four (32 per season) female pigs (Landrace x Large White) of the same age and approximately the same weight, were used. During both seasons, pigs were randomly assigned into two adjacent pens (8 animals per pen), in two identical pig houses, one with an MV system and one with an NV system. Temperature/relative humidity sensors were used to record microclimate conditions in summer (May - July) and winter (December - February) periods, an FHD (1080p) camera to obtain body images for lesion and tail biting scoring and a commercial scale for BW measurements, taken weekly from the 13th week of age to the end of the production cycle. Tail biting (TB) was labelled according to severity and found to be lower under the natural ventilation system for both experimental periods. It was found that BW and WG were affected by the microclimate conditions irrespective of the type of ventilation. Temperatures within the thermal comfort zone, positively affected BW and WG (p < 0.05), under both ventilation systems. No particular body area was found to be preferable in inflicting lesions. Overall, the NV system generally resulted in improved welfare for growing/finishing pigs, due to significantly lower tail biting observed (p < 0.05), hence the NV systems could be preferable under Mediterranean similar to sub-Tropical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42207196What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.