ArticleMemorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz2026
Evaluation of a new rapid diagnostic test, based on the chimeric protein Q5, for the diagnosis of human and canine forms of visceral leishmaniasis.
Article in Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVisceral leishmaniasis (VL), caused by Leishmania infantum, is the most severe form of leishmaniasis, prevalent in many countries, but still with limitations in diagnosis for both human and canine hosts. Serological assays based on recombinant proteins are the most efficient diagnostic alternatives, with the rapid diagnostic test (RDT) being the most cost-effective. The previously described chimeric Q5 is a recombinant protein derived from three native L. infantum antigens, which is potentially useful for both human and canine VL diagnosis, through preliminary enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), but which was not evaluated within an RDT setting.
objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the chimeric recombinant protein Q5 in both ELISA and RDT formats for the detection of human and canine VL, and to compare its performance with RDTs based on Lci2 and Lci13 antigens.
methodsHere, we first expanded the Q5 evaluation through ELISA with a larger set of human and canine VL-positive sera from multiple origins. We confirmed a sensitivity ranging between 80% and 90% for the human VL and greater than 90% with the canine VL sera. A new RDT-Q5 was then set up and tested with multiple batches of human and canine sera.
findingsAn improved performance was seen for the human VL diagnosis (94% sensitivity), but it was reduced with canine sera (86% sensitivity). Specificity values for both the ELISA-Q5 and RDT-Q5 were generally greater than 95%, with limited (8%) or no false-positive results with human sera from individuals with cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) and Chagas disease (CD), respectively. The RDT-Q5 performance was compared with RDTs based on two other recombinant proteins, Lci2 and Lci13, tested respectively for the human and canine VL diagnosis. MAIN
conclusionsDespite an equivalent performance for the human VL diagnosis, the RDT-Lci2 led to a much greater incidence of false-positive results with the CL and CD sera. In contrast, no setup for the RDT-Lci13 was effective with the canine sera. Our results confirm the RDT-Q5 as an efficient alternative for the VL diagnosis in the field, particularly for the human form of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.