ReviewJournal of cell science2026
Escorting mRNAs - the multifunctional and divergent roles of cap-chaperones in post-transcriptional gene expression.
Review in Journal of cell science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcripts undergo a variety of processing steps - including splicing, nuclear export and translation - to ultimately produce their protein product in the required form. Deviations in these steps can produce proteins with altered or ablated function. Central to mRNA processing is the methyl-7-guanosine (m7G) 'cap' on the 5' end of transcripts. This cap engages cap-binding proteins, termed cap-chaperones, which escort transcripts on their path towards protein production. There are two main cap-chaperones: the cap-binding complex (CBC), which was traditionally thought to act only in the nucleus, and the eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4E, thought to act in only the cytoplasm. However, studies have shown that both cap-chaperones localize to nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments, complicating the traditional understanding of their housekeeping roles in mRNA processing. In this updated context, this Review provides an overview of cap-chaperone function, describing their roles both in the nucleus and cytoplasm. We discuss mechanisms by which cap-chaperones differentially engage specific mRNA processing machineries and target transcripts, leading to altered mRNA fate. Finally, we briefly review dysregulation of cap-chaperones and the subsequent disruption of mRNA processing observed in cancer. In all, cap-chaperone choice is likely a significant determinant in mRNA fate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.