Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206936›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Face memory is shaped more by fixation durations and sequences than by where observers fixate within the face.

Zelin Chen, Austin J Hurst, Roxane J Itier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zelin ChenDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Austin J HurstDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Roxane J ItierDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies suggest that fixating on the eyes is critical for face learning and memory but whether this differs with task demands or eye region definition is unclear. We investigated how viewing patterns during face encoding and recognition are shaped by eye region definitions, task demands, and the sequence of fixations. Using an old/new paradigm, participants (N = 108) viewed faces during both encoding and recognition phases under incidental and intentional learning tasks. Recognition accuracy did not differ between the two tasks. During encoding, longer fixation duration predicted lower odds of subsequently recognizing the face. During recognition, early fixations were beneficial for recognizing old faces, relative to later fixations. Importantly, the areas of interest (AOIs) did not differentially predict face memory for previously seen faces, and only significantly predicted categorization of a new face in the intentional task for the large eye region AOI. Most individuals maintained stable fixation patterns across encoding and recognition phases. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion switched viewing strategies across tasks during encoding, whereas fixation patterns during recognition were highly consistent across task demands. Together, these findings suggest that face memory is shaped more by how fixation durations and sequences unfold over time than by where observers fixate within faces.

Indexed as

FaceFacial RecognitionFixation, OcularMemoryPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologyAdultFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42206936
PMCPMC13225298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.