ArticleJournal of vision2026
Face memory is shaped more by fixation durations and sequences than by where observers fixate within the face.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies suggest that fixating on the eyes is critical for face learning and memory but whether this differs with task demands or eye region definition is unclear. We investigated how viewing patterns during face encoding and recognition are shaped by eye region definitions, task demands, and the sequence of fixations. Using an old/new paradigm, participants (N = 108) viewed faces during both encoding and recognition phases under incidental and intentional learning tasks. Recognition accuracy did not differ between the two tasks. During encoding, longer fixation duration predicted lower odds of subsequently recognizing the face. During recognition, early fixations were beneficial for recognizing old faces, relative to later fixations. Importantly, the areas of interest (AOIs) did not differentially predict face memory for previously seen faces, and only significantly predicted categorization of a new face in the intentional task for the large eye region AOI. Most individuals maintained stable fixation patterns across encoding and recognition phases. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion switched viewing strategies across tasks during encoding, whereas fixation patterns during recognition were highly consistent across task demands. Together, these findings suggest that face memory is shaped more by how fixation durations and sequences unfold over time than by where observers fixate within faces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.