ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2026
Improved Detection and Sequencing of Rickettsia spp. DNA in South African Wildlife.
Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRickettsia spp. are obligate intracellular bacteria of the spotted fever group (SFG), typhus group (TG) and transitional group, with diverse vectors and significant zoonotic potential. While Rickettsia africae is well documented in South African ticks, the role of wildlife hosts in pathogen maintenance remains unclear.
methodsWe re-screened 73 spleen samples opportunistically collected from 11 wild mammal species that previously tested negative for Rickettsia by reverse line blot hybridization (RLB). The samples were collected from Kruger National Park, Timbavati Private Nature Reserve, Mountain Zebra National Park and Lapalala Wilderness Reserve. In addition, liver, lymph node and blood samples from two impala were included to preliminarily assess multi-organ dissemination. To increase detection sensitivity, we employed a nested PCR targeting the conserved gltA gene, in contrast to the 23S-5S intergenic spacer (IGS) targeted by RLB.
resultsThe gltA region was successfully amplified by PCR from 32/73 animals (44%; confidence intervals [CI]: 32%-56%). Sequencing of 27 amplicons revealed SFG Rickettsia (n = 22), TG Rickettsia (n = 3) closely related to R. prowazekii and transitional group (n = 1) Rickettsia felis-like sequences. One zebra (Equus quagga) sequence was phylogenetically unresolved, and one sample showed a mixed SFG-TG infection. Rickettsial DNA detections included new host records in giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis), hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius), impala (Aepyceros melampus), warthog (Phacocoerus africanus), white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum) and zebra. Detection across multiple tissues in impala supports systemic dissemination, consistent with experimental evidence of rickettsial persistence in vertebrate tissues.
conclusionsThese findings broaden the known host range and illustrate the complex dynamics of pathogen persistence, host diversity and co-infection, although interpretation is constrained by the limited and uneven sample sizes, which preclude robust population-level inference. Integrating high-sensitivity molecular diagnostics with ecological and vector surveillance within a One Health framework will be critical to clarify wildlife reservoir status and mitigate zoonotic risk at the wildlife-livestock-human interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.