Trial reportBJS open2026
Effect of noise isolation during general anaesthesia on the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain after major abdominal surgery: multicentre randomized clinical study.
Trial report in BJS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06316440 (Effect of Noise Isolation During General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Moderate to Severe Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Noise Isolation During General Anesthesia on the Incidence of Moderate to Severe Postoperative Pain in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative pain remains a major challenge following major abdominal surgery. Noise in the operating room is a modifiable stressor, and the efficacy of targeted noise isolation requires prospective investigation. This study investigated the effects of intraoperative noise isolation on the incidence of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.
methodsThis multicentre randomized clinical trial assessed patients who underwent elective major abdominal surgery under general anaesthesia in four medical centres in China between April, 2024 and May, 2025. Following anaesthesia induction, patients were randomized to either wear noise-cancelling headphones or not (control). The primary outcome of this study was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain (numeric rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 4) within the 24-hour (h) period after surgery. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain, cumulative postoperative pain NRS scores within 48 h after surgery, and the consumption of analgesic drugs within 24 and 48 h after surgery.
resultsIn all, 304 patients were enrolled and randomized; 302 patients were included in the final analysis (150 in the noise isolation group, 152 in the control group). The incidence of moderate-to-severe pain was higher in the control than noise isolation group within 24 h after surgery (49 versus 23%, respectively; relative risk (RR) 0.47; 95% confidence interval (c.i.) 0.33 to 0.65; P < 0.001) and within 48 h after surgery (51 versus 25%, respectively; RR 0.48; 95% c.i. 0.35 to 0.66; P < 0.001). During the 24-h and 48-h periods after surgery, the number of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia boluses was significantly higher in the control group, which also had a higher extra analgesia requirement and increased total analgesic consumption compared with the noise isolation group. The cumulative and maximum rest and movement pain scores were higher in the control than noise isolation group during the 48-h period after surgery.
conclusionsIntraoperative noise isolation was found to be an effective, safe, and non-invasive preventive intervention that significantly lowered the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain after major abdominal surgery, arguing for its integration into standard multimodal analgesic strategies. Registration number: NCT06316440 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.