Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206552›Full record

ReviewSeminars in dialysis

Measures of Equivalent Hemodialysis Urea Clearance and Their Proposed Utility for Monitoring Adequacy.

John T Daugirdas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in dialysis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John T DaugirdasUniversity of Illinois at Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0644-6842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The details of four measures of "equivalent" clearances based on urea that have been proposed to monitor hemodialysis adequacy are reviewed. These measures fall into two groups: one based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the time-averaged serum urea nitrogen concentration, and the other based on urea nitrogen generation rate divided by the average predialysis serum urea nitrogen concentration. After the original variants were proposed, a potential problem regarding relative weights of dialysis and residual kidney clearances was identified, and revised equivalent urea clearances were proposed that give a higher weight to residual kidney clearance relative to dialysis clearance. These measures suggest that the target dialysis dose should be set to achieve dialysis solute concentrations typically found in patients at the point of needing dialysis, e.g., with a glomerular filtration rate of around 10 mL/min, corresponding to a urea clearance of approximately 6 mL/min and a creatinine clearance of 14. Despite the theoretical attractiveness of equivalent urea clearances to monitor hemodialysis adequacy, their utility has not been conclusively demonstrated in observational studies of incremental or more frequent hemodialysis.

Indexed as

Kidney Failure, ChronicRenal DialysisUreaBlood Urea NitrogenGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMonitoring, PhysiologicUreaadequacyclearancehemodialysisurea

Identifiers

PMID42206552
PMCPMC13511374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.