ArticleNucleic acids research2026
Looping specificity of Polycomb response elements requires GAF and a combination of looping factors that could form a code.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chromatin looping between cis-regulatory elements is essential for precise developmental gene expression, and its disruption is frequently linked to disease. Polycomb response elements (PREs) are specialized tethering elements that mediate chromatin loops and are bound by transcription factors (TFs) like GAGA-associated factor (GAF), contributing to the recruitment of Polycomb group (PcG) proteins. While both PcG proteins and GAF have been implicated in looping, their specific roles and the mechanisms of loop specificity remain unresolved. Using genome-wide and locus-specific approaches, we show that high GAF occupancy is required for chromatin looping and gene regulation. However, GAF alone cannot establish loops without additional factors. Surprisingly, PRE looping does not require Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) or the repressive histone mark H3K27me3. Intriguingly, orthologous PRE sequences can rescue looping, while unrelated PREs with similar GAF levels cannot, indicating that looping specificity depends on both GAF levels and compatible factor combinations at loop anchors. Together, our results support a combinatorial model in which GAF collaborates with additional looping factors to drive PRE-specific interactions, suggesting that certain combinations of factors at PREs may determine which elements form loops and contribute to Polycomb-mediated gene silencing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.