ReviewJRSM cardiovascular disease
Anticoagulation in venous thromboembolism and in atrial fibrillation.
Review in JRSM cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolism cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Therefore, anticoagulation therapy (even chronic) is mandatory for the broad majority of affected persons. Warfarin therapy has been, for decades, the best oral anticoagulant alternative for venous thromboembolism, as well as for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. However, modern oral direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are consolidated drugs for these purposes with well-designed pivotal randomized clinical trials, and with long data bases of clinical posterior experience which demonstrate better efficacy, safety, or both than warfarin. However, since DOACs also present some limitations, there are diverse emergent agents and strategies in anticoagulation. This manuscript reviews the available anticoagulation strategies for both clinical entities and presents new rational therapeutic targets in the hemostatic system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.