ArticleJPRAS open2026
Calcific tendinitis of an extensor tendon misdiagnosed as stenosing tenosynovitis: A case report.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Calcific tendonitis refers to the pathological deposition of calcium salts in or around tendons, leading to local inflammation and pain. It is commonly seen in the shoulder region, and occurrences in the wrist or hand are uncommon. This case report aims to describe a patient with calcific tendonitis of the wrist extensor tendons and to highlight the successful use of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) as a treatment. Case presentation: Calcific Tendonitis of Extensor Tendons was diagnosed both via X-ray and Computed Tomography (CT) and was successfully treated with shockwave. Results: After the shockwave treatment, the patient experienced significant improvement in symptoms. Key outcomes included: Immediate Relief: The patient reported a marked reduction in wrist pain right after the ESWT session, with improved ability to move the wrist without discomfort. Continued Improvement: Over the subsequent weeks, her pain continued to diminish and wrist function steadily returned to normal. There were no episodes of recurring pain or swelling during the recovery period. Follow-Up Outcomes: At the 2-month follow-up, the patient was completely pain-free and had full range of motion in the affected wrist. A follow-up X-ray showed that the calcific deposit was no longer evident. Importantly, there were no signs of any complications such as local tissue damage or fractures on the imaging evaluation, confirming the effectiveness of the treatment. Conclusion: This case illustrates that extracorporeal shockwave therapy can be a highly effective treatment for calcific tendonitis before resorting to invasive measures, even at an unusual site like the wrist extensors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.