Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206227›Full record

ArticleGlobal qualitative nursing research

Living Before Dying: Nursing Practice in Supporting Meaningful Living for Patients Receiving Home Care at End-of-Life.

Jérôme Leclerc-Loiselle, Sylvie Gendron, Serge Daneault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global qualitative nursing research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jérôme Leclerc-LoiselleFaculty of Nursing, University of Montréal, QC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9258-5004
Sylvie GendronFaculty of Nursing, University of Montréal, QC, Canada.
Serge DaneaultResearch centre of Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care nursing practice supports individuals and their caregivers through the end-of-life by emphasizing a person-centered approach. However, in practice, nurses must navigate ongoing tensions between organizational norms, professional responsibilities, and the diverse values and wishes of patients, raising questions about how care can remain responsive within complex and constraining contexts. Despite recognition of these challenges, the mechanisms through which palliative care nursing practice sustains meaningful living at the end-of-life remain insufficiently understood. This study examined the mechanisms through which palliative care nursing enables patients to live a meaningful life until death. Using an interpretive descriptive design informed by Sen's capability approach, the study combined three qualitative methods: co-construction of practice narratives with three home-based palliative care nurses, reflexive writing of a personal narrative by the main researcher, and analytical questioning. The analysis identified four interrelated mechanisms that characterize palliative care nursing practice: navigating between patients' valued lives and norms; recognizing patients as simultaneously capable and vulnerable; reflexively engaging with one's own practice; and being creatively present through sensitive and slow actions tailored to each situation. Together, these mechanisms depict a reflexive, relational, and context-sensitive nursing practice oriented toward expanding patients' real possibilities for living a meaningful life until death.

Indexed as

Canadacapability approachend-of-life carehome-based carenarrative inquiryperson-centered

Identifiers

PMID42206227
PMCPMC13201921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.