ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Macronutrient deficiency reduces growth and influences vegetation indices of greenhouse grown ornamental and vegetable plants as measured by the TraitFinder digital phenotyping system.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recent technological advances in high resolution image capture and analysis have led to increased adoption of high-throughput digital phenotyping in plant science research. High-throughput digital phenotyping provides a nondestructive method to quantify changes in plant growth and health in response to environmental factors or developmental cues. Moreover, it allows researchers to conduct large experiments in a time- and cost-efficient manner. The TraitFinder is a digital phenotyping system developed by Phenospex (Heerlen, Netherlands) that measures plant morphological (e.g., digital biomass) and spectral (leaf light reflectance) information. Leaf reflectance is presented as five vegetation indices (e.g., normalized difference vegetation index). Methods: This project evaluated nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) deficiency in greenhouse grown ornamental and vegetable plants using the TraitFinder. Plant species included celosia, coleus, marigold, petunia, and tomato. Plants were fertilized with a complete Hoagland's solution (control), and three modified solutions: Hoagland's solution without nitrogen (-N), phosphorus (-P), or potassium (-K). Each plant species was evaluated separately with eight replicate plants per treatment, organized as a randomized complete block design. Results: Treatment with -N, -P, and -K solutions resulted in reduced vegetative growth and decreased concentration of the corresponding macronutrient in leaf tissue for all species evaluated. We observed that the presence of flowers would negatively affect calculations of the vegetation indices due to their distinct spectral properties; therefore, flowers must be excluded to accurately quantify plant health parameters. In general, we observed a common trend where GLI (green leaf index) and NDVI (normalized difference vegetation index) decreased, and NPCI (normalized pigment chlorophyll index) and PSRI (plant senescence reflectance index) increased in response to macronutrient deficiency. The measure of GLI, NDVI, NPCI, and PSRI were different from the control plants, but these observations were dependent on the nutrient deficiency and species tested. Discussion: Our results underscore the importance of accounting for species-specific spectral signatures when assessing plant responses to nutrient deficiencies. This project also provides reference values for interpreting vegetation indices, offering valuable guidance for scientists implementing digital phenotyping in their experimental protocols. Digital phenotyping can significantly improve experimental throughput and provide quantitative insights into plant health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.