ReviewBMJ neurology open2026
Slowing the curve: a single-arm meta-analysis of mFARS outcomes following omaveloxolone treatment in Friedreich ataxia.
Review in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cells heal themselves: gene-edited hematopoietic stem cells restore frataxin deficiency in multiple organs.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Crosstalk Between Nrf2 and Metabolic Pathways: Redox Regulation, Glutaminolysis, and Cellular Proliferation.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with limited treatments. Omaveloxolone, an Nrf2 activator, was approved based on a phase III trial showing modified Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (mFARS) improvement. Real-world and long-term data now require synthesis. To perform a single-arm meta-analysis pooling mean change in mFARS from baseline across all published omaveloxolone studies and interpret findings against natural history. Four studies (MOXIe Part 1, Part 2, open-label extension, Italian observational) comprising 248 patients were included. Data were harmonised using standard conversions. A random-effects model was used with subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The pooled mean ΔmFARS was -0.05 (95% CI -2.98 to 2.88; p=0.97). Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in controlled trials (-2.19; 95% CI -3.12 to -1.27; p<0.00001) and consistent progression in real-world studies (+2.85; 95% CI 1.62 to 4.08; p<0.00001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness. Controlled trials demonstrate significant short-term improvement with omaveloxolone, while real-world data show consistent progression at rates substantially slower than natural history. These complementary findings support a disease-modifying effect of omaveloxolone in FRDA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.