Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206076›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026

Explainable AI in kidney stone detection and segmentation: a mini review.

Md Jakir Hossen, B M Taslimul Haque, Hasanul Bannah, Md Arifur Rahman, Abir Ahmed, Abdullah Al Noman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Md Jakir HossenCenter for Advanced Analytics, COE for Artificial Intelligence Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Multimedia University, Melaka, Malaysia.
B M Taslimul HaqueInformation Systems, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, United States.
Hasanul BannahFaculty of AI and Engineering, Multimedia University Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Malaysia.
Md Arifur RahmanCollege of Graduate and Professional Studies, Trine University, Angola, IN, United States.
Abir AhmedDepartment of Information Technology, Washington University of Science & Technology, Alexandria, VA, United States.
Abdullah Al NomanWilmington University, New Castle, DE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kidney stones are one of the most common renal disorders that can produce severe complications if not diagnosed and treated early. Recently, advances in AI have ensured that deep learning and explainable AI enable the automatic segmentation and detection of kidney stones from medical imaging, thus improving diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. For this review, eighteen representative studies using machine learning, deep learning, and hybrid models for kidney stone segmentation were considered, which were published in the period between 2020 and 2025. The XAI techniques being mainly utilized with the discussed models in the study are SHAP, LIME, Grad-CAM, Layer-wise Relevance Propagation, and EigenCAM. Such approaches tend to enhance clinicians' trust in allowing early diagnosis and supporting clinical decision-making, especially in resource-constrained settings. Regardless of the towering results, this area still suffers due to certain limitations such as lack of diversity in datasets, absence of multimodal integration, and scarcity of real-world validation. All in all, integrating DL with XAI presents a transparent, reliable, and clinically acceptable approach to detecting and segmenting kidney stones.

Indexed as

clinical decision supportdeep learningexplainable AIgrad-CAMkidney stone segmentationlimemedical imagingshap

Identifiers

PMID42206076
PMCPMC13202716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.