Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206074›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026

Adapting to the digital age in psychiatry: evaluating change in emergency department nurses and psychiatrists' views toward telepsychiatry for involuntary hospitalization.

L Shalev, G Lubin, S Kirresh, I Barash, A Tamary Guterman, E Bloemhof-Bris, S Hirschmann, A Avni, K Avirame, M Linder and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05771545 (Telepsychiatry to Enable Expedited Disposition of Psychiatric Emergencies), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05771545 active not recruitingnot on this map

Telepsychiatry to Enable Expedited Disposition of Psychiatric Emergencies

TypeobservationalSponsorHebrew University of JerusalemRan2023 to 2026Enrolled959ConditionsPsychiatric EmergencyArmsTelepsychiatry
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

L ShalevBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
G LubinBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
S KirreshThe Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
I BarashThe Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
A Tamary GutermanLev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tzur Moshe, Israel.
E Bloemhof-BrisLev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tzur Moshe, Israel.
S HirschmannLev Hasharon Mental Health Center, Tzur Moshe, Israel.
A AvniPsychiatric Division, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
K AviramePsychiatric Division, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
M LinderSha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Shaar Menashe, Israel.
D BathishSha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Shaar Menashe, Israel.
R BadranSha'ar Menashe Mental Health Center, Shaar Menashe, Israel.
Y TurmPsychiatric Department, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel.
B BlochThe Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Technion, Haifa, Israel.
S KonasGeha Mental Health Center, Petach Tiqwa, Israel.
L IzaksonPsychiatric Division, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
F AsadPsychiatric Division, Ziv Medical Center, Safed, Israel.
Y MelamedFaculty of Medical & Health Sciences, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel.
S RaskinMinistry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel.
D RazMinistry of Justice, Jerusalem, Israel.
R EitanBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
A J RoseBraun School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Implementing change in organizations is challenging, and a key factor in success is the perception of the implementers. While many studies report on implementers' perceptions as barriers or facilitators for implementing innovations, they often do not examine how these perceptions change over time. We aimed to evaluate changes in perceptions among nurses and psychiatrists in emergency departments (EDs) regarding the implementation of telepsychiatry (live video) for involuntary hospitalization. Methods: This study utilized quantitative and qualitative methods, administering an online questionnaire to nurses and psychiatrists in eight EDs in Israel before and after telepsychiatry implementation. The questionnaire included: 1. Background characteristics (i.e., role and seniority); 2. SHEMESH questionnaire ("Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment") comprising 11 items about the evidence for telepsychiatry, its feasibility, its effectiveness compared to face-to-face evaluation, and items about how supportive the ED environment for implementing changes in practice; 3. Two open-ended questions about how telepsychiatry would fit patients and the challenges in using telepsychiatry for involuntary commitment. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Results: 344 participants completed the questionnaire (54% from the pre-implementation phase and 46% from the telepsychiatry phase). Both phases showed high scores on the overall Evidence construct, indicating that telepsychiatry is evidence-based, with an increase from the pre-implementation to the telepsychiatry phase. High scores on the overall Context construct were also observed, with no difference between phases. A regression model identified study phase, psychiatrists, and management team as predictors of higher Evidence and Context scores. Respondents' comments in the pre-implementation phase focused on concerns about feasibility, while comments in the telepsychiatry phase focused on patient cooperation and agitated patients. Questions about professionalism arose in both phases. Overall, negative responses decreased significantly during the telepsychiatry phase, while perceptions of telepsychiatry's fit for patients increased, though not statistically significantly. Discussion: Ongoing use of an innovation over time can result in a favorable change in implementers' perceptions as they grow accustomed to the innovation and appreciate its advantages, such as increased efficiency and improved results. Clinical Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05771545, March 15, 2023.

Indexed as

adaptationdigital health (eHealth)emergency departmentimplementation scienceinnovationorganizational changetelepsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID42206074
PMCPMC13201233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.