ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Predictive value of thyroid autoantibodies for coronary heart disease severity in individuals with normal thyroid function based on machine learning and SHAP interpretation.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Assessing the severity of coronary heart disease (CHD) is critical for clinical decision-making. Thyroid autoantibodies are associated with cardiovascular disease, but their ability to predict CHD severity remains unclear. This study aimed to systematically elucidate the predictive value of thyroid autoantibodies for CHD severity using machine learning methods. Methods: This retrospective study included 942 patients hospitalized in the cardiovascular department between January 2024 and June 2025, comprising 590 patients with severe lesions and 352 with nonsevere lesions. Traditional statistical analysis employed correlation analysis and multivariate logistic regression. Eight machine learning models were subsequently constructed and compared: logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost), multilayer perceptron (MLP), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and XGBoost (XGB). The optimal model was determined using Shapley additive propagation (SHAP), and the robustness of the core findings was validated through hierarchical analysis and subgroup feature importance comparisons. Results: Multivariate logistic regression revealed that log anti-TPO was an independent risk factor for severe coronary lesions (OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.87-2.57; P<0.001), whereas log anti-Tg shows a negative correlation after adjustment (OR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.61-0.85; P<0.001). However, given the significant multicollinearity between the two variables (r = 0.55), this negative correlation strongly suggests that it is a statistical artifact. The gradient boosting tree performed best (AUROC:0.855). SHAP analysis consistently confirmed three key predictive features: log anti-TPO, log anti-Tg, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). SHAP dependency plots further revealed a distinct threshold effect for log anti-TPO, while elevated log anti-Tg was associated with reduced risk, However, this negative association is likely a statistical artifact rather than an independent protective effect. Stratified analysis and sex-specific feature importance assessments confirmed that log anti-TPO demonstrated a highly robust and significant predictive value across all the subgroups, ranking as the primary predictor in both the male and female cohorts. Conclusion: The presence of thyroid autoantibodies represents an independent key predictor of CHD severity. Thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPO-Ab) serve as a strong risk marker, The gradient boosting tree model demonstrated optimal predictive performance when these biomarkers were integrated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.