Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206016›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

A randomised controlled trial of EP395, a novel anti-inflammatory macrolide, in stable COPD patients.

Henrik Watz, Stephanie Korn, Oliver Kornmann, Dave Singh, Tom Wilkinson, Kate Hanrott, Karl J Staples, Jodie Ackland, Virginia Norris

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05572333 (A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of EP395 in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05572333 phase2completednot on this map

A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Safety and Tolerability of EP395 in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEpiEndo PharmaceuticalsRan2022 to 2023Enrolled61ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPDArmsEP395, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Henrik WatzVelocity Clinical Research Germany GmbH, Ahrensburg, Germany.
Stephanie KornIKF Pneumologie Mainz, Clinical Research Centre Respiratory Diseases, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2239-5029
Oliver KornmannIKF Pneumologie Frankfurt, Clinical Research Centre Respiratory Diseases, Frankfurt, Germany.
Dave SinghThe Medicines Evaluation Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Tom WilkinsonClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.
Kate HanrottEpiEndo Pharmaceuticals, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9629-8491
Karl J StaplesClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3844-6457
Jodie AcklandClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3120-3620
Virginia NorrisEpiEndo Pharmaceuticals, Reykjavík, Iceland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Macrolide antibiotics have immunomodulatory activity and when taken chronically reduce exacerbations of COPD. However, chronic use can cause bacterial resistance. EP395 (glasmacinal), a novel macrolide, is being developed as a treatment to reduce exacerbations of COPD without inducing antimicrobial resistance. Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial (NCT05572333), patients (≥45 years old, diagnosed with COPD for ≥2 years and stable on at least one maintenance inhaled therapy) were randomised (2:1) to EP395 or placebo daily for 12 weeks. The primary objective was safety, with key secondary objectives assessing pharmacodynamic effects of EP395. Results: A total of 61 patients were randomised (42 EP395, 19 placebo). A 12-week course of EP395 was well tolerated: no serious adverse events were considered related to EP395, and adverse events occurred in similar proportions in both groups (64.3% EP395, 63.2% placebo). Four patients were withdrawn due to adverse events (three EP395, one placebo). Sputum neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase, mediators of neutrophil activation, were reduced with EP395 (treatment difference (log scale): neutrophil elastase -0.415 ng·mL Conclusion: In patients with stable COPD, EP395 for 12 weeks was well tolerated, demonstrated selective anti-inflammatory activity and had no detectable effect on the lung microbiome.

Identifiers

PMID42206016
PMCPMC13202357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.