ArticleERJ open research2026
Association of German Bronchiectasis Registry participation with disease course.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bronchiectasis research has advanced significantly through international and national registries, such as the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) registry, revealing crucial insights into the disease's heterogeneous nature. These efforts underscore the importance of precise patient phenotyping and the identification of underlying causes to improve management and outcomes in bronchiectasis. Methods: The prospective, non-interventional PROGNOSIS registry has collected data from over 1500 computed tomography-confirmed adult bronchiectasis patients across 38 German sites, excluding those with cystic fibrosis or lung transplants. Aligned with the EMBARC registry, it ensures comprehensive clinical data collection. Statistical analyses of baseline and follow-up data aims to assess disease progression and patient outcomes. Results: Key outcomes include a reduction in median (interquartile range (IQR)) exacerbations (2 (1-4) to 1 (1-3); p<0.001) and hospitalisations (1 (1-2) to 1 (1-1); p<0.001), demonstrating an improvement in managing the disease during patients' participation in the registry. Lung function (median (IQR) forced expiratory volume in 1 s % pred 73% (51-90%) to 73% (52-92%); p=0.6) remained stable over time, contradicting the expected decline in such chronic lung conditions. There was a significant decrease in active smokers (4.4% to 3.6%; p<0.001), and improvements were seen in sputum quantity and quality. There was an increase in the detection of pathogens, particularly Conclusion: The PROGNOSIS registry highlights the critical role of comprehensive management in bronchiectasis, emphasising infection control and treatment adherence. It underscores the need for personalised treatment by identifying the underlying aetiology and reinforces the ongoing importance of research in improving patient care and quality of life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.