Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42206014›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

e-Lung computed tomography biomarkers are associated with outcomes in fibrotic interstitial lung diseases.

Katharina Abbasi Dezfouli, Anand Devaraj, Finja A Ottink, Christian Rennison-Jones, Aliki Sifostratoudaki, Claire Fernandez, Oyunbileg von Stackelberg, Hans-Ulrich Kauczor, Manuel Debic, Kai Schlamp and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Katharina Abbasi DezfouliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Anand DevarajInterstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Finja A OttinkBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Christian Rennison-JonesBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Aliki SifostratoudakiBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Claire FernandezBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Oyunbileg von StackelbergDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hans-Ulrich KauczorDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Manuel DebicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-324X
Kai SchlampDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology with Nuclear Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katharina BuschulteTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Claus Peter HeusselTranslational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-5733
James H BriggsBrainomix, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5211-8770
Stephen GerryCentre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
George W J HarstonBrainomix, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-5757
Wassim Bou-ZeidBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Olivier JolyBrainomix, Oxford, UK.
Peter M GeorgeInterstitial Lung Disease Unit, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1316-4891
Michael KreuterMainz Center for Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pneumology, Mainz University Medical Center and Department of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Marienhaus Clinic Mainz, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The e-Lung weighted reticulovascular score (WRVS) is an automated computed tomography biomarker that quantifies interstitial lung disease (ILD) severity and is associated with prognosis in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The aims of the present study were to evaluate WRVS as a prognostic factor in patients with non-IPF ILD. Methods: The test cohort comprised patients from the Open Source Imaging Consortium and the validation cohort, patients recruited to the prospective German CoWorker ILD registry. Associations between baseline and serial WRVS with future forced vital capacity (FVC) decline and survival were tested. Results: Median survival was 7.1 and 6.1 years in the test (n=302) and validation (n=378) cohorts, respectively. Baseline WRVS was associated with mortality in test (hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95% CI 1.08-1.14; p<0.001, C-index 0.75) and validation (HR 1.12, 95% CI 1.09-1.15; p<0.001, C-index 0.72) cohorts. A threshold WRVS of ≥15% was associated with mortality in both cohorts (HR 4.77, 95% CI 3.11-7.31; p<0.001, C-index 0.71, and HR 3.49, 95% CI 2.48-4.91; p<0.001, C-index 0.63 for test and validation cohorts, respectively). After adjustment for FVC, age and sex, baseline WRVS was associated with future FVC decline or death in test (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.06-1.21; p<0.001, C-index 0.72) and validation (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25; p<0.001, C-index 0.72) cohorts. A rise in WRVS of 3% on serial computed tomography was associated with mortality in both test (HR 5.69, 95% CI 2.77-11.70; p<0.001, C-index 0.75) and validation cohorts (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.09-3.65; p=0.026, C-index 0.57). Conclusion: In patients with non-IPF ILD, the e-Lung WRVS biomarker is associated with mortality and FVC decline when applied to baseline high-resolution computed tomography scans replicating previous studies in IPF. Patients with an increase in WRVS of 3% on serial computed tomography scans have significantly increased risk of mortality.

Identifiers

PMID42206014
PMCPMC13202359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.