Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Adopting a user-centred design approach for the development of on-device technology to prevent the viewing of child sexual abuse material: app design insights and principles from the development of 'Salus'.

Deanna Davy, Suzanne Beaufoy, Stefan Bogaerts, Minne De Boeck, Elien De Caluwé, Erifili Efthymiadou, Rhea Joy, Lea Kamitz, Manon Kleijn, Julia Nentzl and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Deanna DavyAnglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Suzanne BeaufoyStopSo UK, Rochester, United Kingdom.
Stefan BogaertsTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Minne De BoeckAntwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Elien De CaluwéAntwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Erifili EfthymiadouLucy Faithfull Foundation, Stoke Prior, United Kingdom.
Rhea JoyHM Prison and Probation Service, London, United Kingdom.
Lea KamitzAnglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Manon KleijnTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Julia NentzlCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin's Institute of Sexology and Sexual Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Lee SmithAnglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.
Larissa Van PuyveldeAntwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sarah WefersLucy Faithfull Foundation, Stoke Prior, United Kingdom.
Samantha LundriganAnglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The volume of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM) available online and the global demand for it has reached unprecedented levels. Increasing numbers of individuals concerned about their online behaviour are contacting therapeutic providers for help and support outside of the criminal justice system. Previous research asking individuals what would help them to stop viewing CSAM suggests that the availability of a technological solution to voluntarily self-manage access to CSAM could be an effective tool. Aim: To explore the findings from the user-centered design (UCD) of the 'Salus' prototype - a technological prevention tool to support effective self-management of individuals at risk of committing a first or further CSAM offence(s). Materials and methods: In this two-year, European Commission funded project we conducted research in four European countries: Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom (UK). For the UCD phase of the project we conducted semi-structured interviews with 31 at-risk individuals in Belgium (n=10), Germany (n=10) and the UK (n=11), to explore the specific needs, design features, deployment methods, and concerns and barriers for the design, functionality and deployment of Salus. Additionally, four focus group discussions (FGDs) were held in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the UK with service providers (primarily therapists and managers) with extensive experience of supporting individuals at risk of committing CSAM offences to explore the same questions at the service level. Results: In terms of privacy and security, the potential discovery of apps such as Salus, data security and legal consequences of app usage are the main concerns of potential app users. There was consensus on the value of blocking CSAM, but opinions on the inclusion of an optional adult sexual content (pornography) filter in Salus design were not unanimous. Users should be able to switch a pornography filter on and off at their convenience. Blocking notifications should be quiet and subtle. Interactivity features are welcomed by potential users - these may include a diary function; a personal CSAM statistics page; a resources section; and a function to allow users to provide feedback to the app developers. Such features should be optional for users in order to prevent any unintended consequences of app usage. Finally, app deployment must be safe and secure. Conclusion: Based on these findings, we propose seven evidence-based design principles for user-centered harm-reduction technology: privacy-by-default architecture; discretion through design ambiguity; adaptive notification systems; optional interactivity with user control; trusted-channel deployment; progressive trust building; and fail-safe harm prevention. These principles provide a framework for app developers and researchers working on similar technologies to develop interventions that reduce harmful behaviours.

Indexed as

child sexual abuse materialoffender managementpreventiontechnologyuser-centred design

Identifiers

PMID42205999
PMCPMC13201391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.