Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205963›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Are all digital hoarding behavior alike? Uncovering the pathways to digital hoarding behavior in the workplace.

Zhao Dong, Mingxu Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhao DongSchool of Management Science and Information Engineering, Business Big Data Research Center of Jilin Province, Jilin University of Finance and Economics, Changchun, China.
Mingxu BaoSchool of International Business, Jilin International Studies University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals' excessive preservation and accumulation of digital information may result in digital hoarding behavior. In the workplace, employees may engage in such behavior due to concerns about losing potentially useful information and its possible impact on task performance within the information ecology. Method: Drawing on information ecology theory, this study develops a configurational model to examine the antecedents of digital hoarding behavior in the workplace. Using fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA), we empirically analyze survey data from 268 employees in China. Conclusion: The results reveal the complex and interdependent effects of the antecedent conditions on digital hoarding behavior, identifying three configurations that drive a high level of digital hoarding behavior in the workplace. Perceived ease of use emerges as a key condition that facilitates employees' digital hoarding behavior. In contrast, a low level of digital hoarding behavior follows two distinct configurations, in which the absence of perceived usefulness and deficiency in AI adoption play important inhibitory roles. Discussion: This study extends the research perspective of digital hoarding behavior in the workplace and provides important practical guidance for managers seeking to improve digital information management and employee work efficiency.

Indexed as

digital hoarding behavioremployeefsQCAinformation ecology theoryworkplace

Identifiers

PMID42205963
PMCPMC13201440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.