ArticleApplied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association2026
How Forming a Department-Specific Employee Safety Team Impacted Mitigating Risk and Improving the Safety Culture in an Animal Resources Core Facility.
Article in Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Laboratory staff working in animal facilities face occupational risks beyond biological and chemical hazards. Organizations working with hazardous agents and animals must protect staff by developing safety programs focusing on risk reduction and fostering a positive safety culture. Methods: At the Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, we formed a department-specific employee safety team tasked with rolling out the Employee Safety Bundle (ESB). The ESB outlines practices and tools to prevent incidents and ensure a safe work environment. This program requires departments with frequent Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordable incidents to develop a Quantitative Risk Assessment framework. The ESB components assist with reducing the overall risks in each area by developing procedure-specific risk mitigations. Additionally, the department-specific employee safety team must develop initiatives to improve the overall safety culture within the department. Results: The quantitative risk assessment tool helped us identify the high-risk areas within our animal resources core (ARC) facility. We then utilized the hierarchy of controls to develop risk mitigation plans and decrease the overall risk score in each area within the ARC facility. Additionally, this program requires annual re-evaluation and a focus on continuous improvement that has helped the animal facility reduce injuries, increase near-miss reporting, and improve the safety culture. Conclusion: This risk score-based framework has evolved into a more holistic risk mitigation system that involves department staff members, senior leadership, safety, and other subject matter experts working together to improve the operations within an animal facility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.