ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Proton Therapy for Head and Neck Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma: A Multi-institutional Review.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate efficacy and toxicity (CTCAE v4.0) outcomes in patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) treated with proton beam therapy (PBT). Patients and Methods: From 2012 through 2023, 79 patients with non-metastatic ACC were treated with PBT and enrolled on the Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) registry. Kaplan-Meier analyses quantified locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). ACC patients receiving reirradiation with PBT were excluded from this analysis. Results: Median follow-up was 3 years (0.01-6.72). Twenty-six patients were unable to undergo surgery and received definitive PBT versus postoperative PBT (n=53). Median postoperative PBT dose was 66 GyE and 70 GyE for definitive patients treated with conventional fractionation. Most patients had localized disease (n=75); few had nodal metastases (n=4). 62% were locally advanced (T3-T4) at the time of PBT treatment. 3-year Locoregional control (LRC) for all patients was 98% [95% CI (94.3, 100)]. Advanced T-staging, positive margins and definitive-intent PBT were not associated with worsened LRC. 3-year Progression free survival (PFS) was 80.5% (70.6, 91.7). Patients receiving definitive intent PBT had lower but nonsignificant PFS (73.3% vs. 83.8%, p-0.075). Advanced T-staging and positive margins did not have worsened PFS. Overall survival at 3 years was 89.2% (81.4, 97.8). Acute grade 3 toxicities occurred in 16 patients, the most common included the following: mucositis (n=5), oral pain (n=3), and dermatitis (n=5). Late grade 3 toxicity (n=2) included middle ear inflammation (n=1) and skin ulceration (n=1). There were no grade 4+ toxicities. Conclusion: PBT appears to be highly efficacious in providing LRC for patients with ACC including those patients treated with definitive intent. PBT toxicity was acceptable. Longer follow-up is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.