Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205844›Full record

ArticleBlockchain in healthcare today2026

Blockchain-Enabled Electronic Health Record Model for Managing Patients' Vital Data and Medical Reports.

Aditi Sharma, Rajesh Kumar Kaushal, Naveen Kumar Chitkara, Ekkarat Boonchieng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blockchain in healthcare today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aditi SharmaResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8306-6068
Rajesh Kumar KaushalResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4186-3868
Naveen Kumar ChitkaraResearch Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3861-0600
Ekkarat BoonchiengProfessor, Department of Computer Applications, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Punjab, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7584-1627

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Internet of Medical Things is revolutionizing the concept of patient care. It is empowering the implementation of remote patient care protocols through the use of body sensors to monitor vital signs. However, it produces vast amounts of information, which raises security and privacy concerns. High-dimensional medical data are essential for diagnosis and treatment, but they are not currently connected to blockchain-based electronic health record systems. To overcome these limitations, the authors present a Hyperledger Fabric-based secure remote patient monitoring model for storing and retrieving medical imaging. The system records patient vital signs using sensors and stores medical images off-chain in the InterPlanetary File System. This model uses two organizations and a single channel, with Raft consensus, to ensure data consistency and high performance. Additionally, this study evaluates the performance of the proposed system in terms of throughput and latency. A test was conducted at 1,200 transactions with varying transfer rates. The results reveal that the throughput was near the send rate, up to 90 TPS. At a send rate of 150 TPS, the system reaches its peak throughput of 117.04 TPS. Moreover, no transactions were lost, which means that the system was able to make all its transactions, representing system reliability. The latency was noted to be 0.21 to 2.24 s, whereas the read operation was always characterized by the same latency of 0.01 s.

Indexed as

blockchainelectronic health recordhyperledger caliperhyperledger fabricperformance evaluationremote patient monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42205844
PMCPMC13186147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.