Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205804›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Health implications of dog-worn equipment: a review of known and alleged physical risks.

Marcella Ridgway

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marcella RidgwayCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dogs are routinely managed using collars, harnesses and other equipment following practices that have been adhered to for centuries, yet concerns about potential adverse health effects have rarely been addressed through structured investigation. This review presents the existing literature regarding impacts of commonly-used dog-worn equipment, generally limited to studies of generated pressures and leash forces, effects on gait and intraocular pressure and a few case reports of equipment-related trauma. Additional studies are needed to specifically evaluate health risks and assess the validity of claimed adverse impacts of collars and other equipment. Until such evidence is established, heightened awareness of the associations of equipment with important and potentially vulnerable anatomic structures and functions as well as known risks presented herein can serve as a touchstone for safe, thoughtful practice in use of dog-worn equipment by all those who work with dogs.

Indexed as

canine healthcollardog-worn equipmentharnessleashmuzzlevest

Identifiers

PMID42205804
PMCPMC13204415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.