ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Learning curve of distal transradial access for coronary intervention: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The vascular access site for coronary intervention has evolved from the femoral artery to the conventional radial artery; more recently, the distal transradial access (dTRA) approach has been established. Although dTRA is preferred owing to its association with improved patient comfort and reduced complications, it is associated with a steep learning curve. We aimed to analyze the learning curve of the dTRA approach and explore the factors associated with procedural success to gain insights shortening the learning curve and enhancing safety and efficiency. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study of 150 consecutive coronary procedures attempted via the dTRA by an experienced radial operator between April 23, 2025, and August 23, 2025. To delineate the learning curve, we analyzed the operator's success rate, number of puncture attempts, and procedure time across case intervals. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression model was used to identify the predictors of access failure. Results: The overall success rate was 87.3% (131 of 150 procedures). The spline-based learning curve analysis demonstrated a two-phase maturation process: the operator's predicted probability of success plateaued after approximately 75 cases, while measures of procedural efficiency (puncture attempts and time) continued to optimize and stabilized at approximately 100 cases. LASSO regression analysis revealed the anterior-wall puncture technique as a significant technical factor associated with success. Conversely, high baseline brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels were identified as patient-related clinical risk markers predicting procedural failure. Notably, 100 pg/mL and 10 mmHg increases in BNP and SBP levels were associated with 1.9% and 0.8% decreases in the odds of success, respectively (odds ratio = 0.98 per 100 pg/mL and 0.992 per 10 mmHg, respectively). Conclusion: For an experienced operator in radial access, proficiency in the dTRA technique was achieved after approximately 75 procedures. From a technical standpoint, promoting the anterior-wall puncture technique may effectively increase success rates. Considering the patient's perspective, high pre-operative BNP and SBP levels serve as potential risk markers predicting puncture difficulty and demand substantial attention during pre-procedural assessment. However, the validity of these findings warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.