ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Refractive Risk Factors for Amblyopia in Turkish Preschoolers: A School-Based Vision Screening Study of 1126 Children.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate refractive risk factors for unilateral and bilateral amblyopia. Methods: In October 2019, 1126 preschool and primary school 1st grade students in Kozlu district of Zonguldak province underwent eye screening with a pediatric autorefractometer in a school environment. 125 children who were above the threshold values determined for refractive errors or for whom measurements could not be taken due to patient compliance were referred to us for eye examination. The referred children underwent a comprehensive eye examination. Amblyopia risk factors were analyzed with a logistic regression model. Results: Of the 125 referred children 106 were examined comprehensively. Of those 99 were analyzed. A total of 30 amblyopic children were identified (Unilateral amblyopia n=20, bilateral amblyopia n=10). The prevalence of amblyopia was found to be 2.6%. In regression analysis, presence of <2 D and 2-4 D hyperopia were found to be isolated risk factors for amblyopia (p<0.05). Astigmatism was a risk factor unilateral and bilateral amblyopia in univariate analysis (p=0.001, p=0.001 respectively). Incrementing values of anisometropia did not influence the development of amblyopia. However, the incidence rate of amblyopia increased in the incrementing diopters of anisometropia (11.4% at 0.5 D and below, 25.9% at 0.5-1 D range, 54.5% at 1-2 D range, 100% for 2 D and above). Myopia association with amblyopia was not statistically significant. Conclusion: We found lower than the generally accepted threshold values of hypermetropia, astigmatism and anisometropia to be risk factors for amblyopia. Our data can help shape threshold values and screening policies for refractive errors. More population-based studies are needed in different regions of our country in order to make guidelines consisting of optimal threshold values that can be used in amblyopia screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.