ArticleCureus2026
Association Between Early Versus Delayed Outpatient Follow-Up After Hospital Discharge and Short-Term Healthcare Utilization Among ICU Survivors.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntensive care unit (ICU) survivors experience high rates of healthcare utilization after hospital discharge, including readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits. Timely outpatient follow-up has been proposed to improve care transitions, but its impact on critically ill populations remains uncertain.
objectiveTo assess whether early outpatient follow-up within three days compared with delayed follow-up between seven and 14 days after discharge is associated with differences in 30-day healthcare utilization among adult ICU survivors.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, including linked ED records. Adult ICU survivors discharged from the hospital were included. The exposure was the timing of the first post-discharge outpatient follow-up, defined as the first scheduled outpatient visit after discharge and categorized as early or delayed. ED visits and hospital readmissions were not included in the exposure definition. Outcomes were 30-day hospital readmission and ED visit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate associations, adjusting for demographic and clinical variables.
resultsA total of 10,123 patients were included. Early follow-up was not associated with differences in 30-day readmission or ED visits compared with delayed follow-up. Higher comorbidity burden and illness severity were associated with increased readmission risk, while exposure timing showed no significant association with either outcome.
conclusionsEarly outpatient follow-up alone may not be associated with differences in short-term healthcare utilization among ICU survivors, although residual confounding and potential biases should be considered. More comprehensive post-discharge care strategies may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.