Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205622›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026

Blood pressure telemonitoring and the incidence of cardiovascular events: a records based, matched patient analysis.

Janet Hanley, Mary Paterson, Richard Parker, Alice Pearsons, Roz Pollock, Lis Neubeck, Iain Atherton, Brian McKinstry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Janet HanleyEdinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Science, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1728-0136
Mary PatersonEdinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Science, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK.
Richard ParkerUniversity of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Alice PearsonsEdinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Science, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7231-2180
Roz PollockUniversity of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK.
Lis NeubeckEdinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Science, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5852-1034
Iain AthertonEdinburgh Napier University, School of Health and Social Science, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh EH11 4BN, UK.
Brian McKinstryUniversity of Edinburgh, Usher Institute, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9581-0468

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: It is well established from trials that blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring leads to improved BP control. However, there is little data available on the impact of BP telemonitoring on the incidence of cardiovascular events when it is used as the routine mode of long-term BP monitoring. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of BP telemonitoring on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results: Records were analysed for 454 180 adults with hypertension who had a prescription for a first-line anti-hypertensive drug at any time from 1 March 2019 to 28 February 2021. Follow-up was until 1st March 2022. Women pregnant during that time were excluded. The primary outcome was emergency hospital admission or mortality for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Stroke, or uncontrolled Heart Failure (HF) within 12 months. Outcomes were compared between people who had used BP telemonitoring for at least 1 year and a group who had never used it, matched for age, sex, ethnicity, social deprivation, number of anti-hypertensive drugs, diabetes, and having a BP assessment in the same year. Ninety percent of the cohort had been diagnosed with hypertension before March 2019. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 was associated with a rapid increase in the uptake of BP telemonitoring but a reduction in the number of new diagnoses of hypertension. Those who used telemonitoring were significantly younger, less likely to have diabetes, and took less antihypertensive medication. For those who used telemonitoring for over 1 year, a mean reduction in systolic BP was seen by 3 months which was maintained for at least the remainder of the year. Conclusion: In the matched cohort analysis, people who used telemonitoring were less likely to be admitted to hospital with or die from ACS, stroke, or uncontrolled HF telemonitoring [adjusted OR 0.665 (0.501 to 0.884),

Indexed as

blood pressureHypertensionobservational studytelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID42205622
PMCPMC13208916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.