ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2026
Blood pressure telemonitoring and the incidence of cardiovascular events: a records based, matched patient analysis.
Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: It is well established from trials that blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring leads to improved BP control. However, there is little data available on the impact of BP telemonitoring on the incidence of cardiovascular events when it is used as the routine mode of long-term BP monitoring. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of BP telemonitoring on cardiovascular outcomes. Methods and results: Records were analysed for 454 180 adults with hypertension who had a prescription for a first-line anti-hypertensive drug at any time from 1 March 2019 to 28 February 2021. Follow-up was until 1st March 2022. Women pregnant during that time were excluded. The primary outcome was emergency hospital admission or mortality for Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), Stroke, or uncontrolled Heart Failure (HF) within 12 months. Outcomes were compared between people who had used BP telemonitoring for at least 1 year and a group who had never used it, matched for age, sex, ethnicity, social deprivation, number of anti-hypertensive drugs, diabetes, and having a BP assessment in the same year. Ninety percent of the cohort had been diagnosed with hypertension before March 2019. The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 was associated with a rapid increase in the uptake of BP telemonitoring but a reduction in the number of new diagnoses of hypertension. Those who used telemonitoring were significantly younger, less likely to have diabetes, and took less antihypertensive medication. For those who used telemonitoring for over 1 year, a mean reduction in systolic BP was seen by 3 months which was maintained for at least the remainder of the year. Conclusion: In the matched cohort analysis, people who used telemonitoring were less likely to be admitted to hospital with or die from ACS, stroke, or uncontrolled HF telemonitoring [adjusted OR 0.665 (0.501 to 0.884),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.