ArticleBMJ public health2026
Temporal associations between smoking prevalence and smoking-related mortality: a US state-level ecological study.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Smoking is the leading cause of preventable deaths worldwide. Consequently, smoking reduction interventions have major long-term public health benefits. However, the temporal association of smoking-related mortality remains ill-defined. Therefore, this study describes the lag-response of smoking prevalence reduction on smoking-related mortality. Methods: Our study included smoking prevalence and mortality for the US states. Generalised additive models (GAM) with random intercepts were used to model the cause-specific mortality as a function of the smoking prevalence history. The lag-response of an absolute 5% smoking prevalence reduction was estimated using a distributed lag non-linear model. Covariables were included accounting for demographics, socioeconomic status and general trends. Results: Based on smoking prevalence data from 8 354 095 people, the relationship between smoking prevalence history and smoking-related mortality rates appeared non-linear. The largest association with mortality (per 100 000 person-years) caused by ischaemic heart disease was observed at 8 years (-3.02 (95% CI -4.31 to -1.73)), 10 years for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (-1.35 (95% CI -1.89 to -0.82)), 11 years for lung cancer (-1.68 (95% CI -2.44 to -0.91)) and for other smoking-related cancers at 20 years (-0.61 (95% CI -0.81 to -0.40)).Notably, COPD mortality showed a rapid decline. Our results estimated an absolute 5% reduction in smoking prevalence from 1999 onwards is associated with a reduced mortality in 2019 by 23.91% (95% CI 15.36% to 32.46%) for ischaemic heart diseases, 30.82% (95% CI 22.81% to 38.83%) for COPD, 25.20% (95% CI 18.85% to 31.55%) for lung cancer and 7.88% (95% CI 5.24% to 10.52%) for other smoking-related cancers. Conclusion: Impact and timing of smoking reduction vary across causes of death. Notably, COPD-related deaths decrease rapidly. The largest association of smoking prevalence on COPD and lung cancer mortality occurred after 10 years and 11 years, while for ischaemic heart diseases, it was at 8 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.