ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2026
Comparison of Early-, Average-, and Late-Onset Pancreatic Cancer in a Multi-Site Cancer Center: Treatment Patterns and Outcomes.
Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate treatment and outcomes differences, as well as predictors of early mortality, among early-onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma (EOPC, ≤50 years), average-onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AOPC, 51-69 years), and late-onset pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LOPC, ≥70 years). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 333 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma at a multi-site center between 2011-2018. Clinical, demographic, and treatment variables were compared by age group. Predictors of early mortality (death ≤6 months from diagnosis) were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results: Among the 333 patients, 56% were male, and the mean age was 61.5 years. EOPC patients had higher rates of tobacco use (68% vs 54%, p=0.0094) and higher histological grade (57% vs, 41%, p=0.048) than older cohorts. In non-metastatic patients, EOPC patients were more likely to undergo curative intent surgery (70% vs 38%, p≤0.0001) and receive adjuvant radiation (40% vs 15%, p=0.002). Early mortality occurred in 28% of non-metastatic and 59% of metastatic patients, with lower rates in EOPC. Predictors of early mortality included older age, higher neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lack of surgery, and absence of radiation therapy in univariable analysis; however, none of these factors remained significant in multivariable analysis. Median survival was 11.1 months in EOPC, 8.7 months in AOPC, and 4.3 months in LOPC. Conclusions: EOPC patients demonstrate better survival and receive more treatments than older cohorts. Despite these differences, PC outcomes remain poor across all groups. Further research is warranted to validate early mortality predictors and inflammatory biomarkers in EOPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.