ArticleJournal of patient-centered research and reviews2026
The Compassionate HEART Patient Questionnaire: Validation and Reliability of a Novel Measure of Relationship-Centered Care.
Article in Journal of patient-centered research and reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To establish the validity and reliability of the Compassionate HEART Patient Questionnaire (CHPQ) for measuring relationship-centered care and exploring associations between patient ratings and mood state changes in patients with persistent pain. Methods: Thirty-nine adults with persistent pain (>3 months) completed pre-/post-interaction Profile of Mood States assessments and rated providers using the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) measure and the novel CHPQ following physical therapy evaluations. Psychometric properties were assessed through factor analysis, concurrent validity (correlation with CARE), and internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha). Pre-post mood changes were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The CHPQ demonstrated good internal consistency (α = 0.86) and moderate correlation with CARE (r = 0.673, p < 0.001). Factor analysis revealed three factors explaining 85.9% of variance: Connected Compassionate Competence (54.3%), Genuine Therapeutic Presence (18.1%), and Relational Alliance (13.5%). Total Mood Disturbance decreased significantly post-interaction (-17.41 points, p < 0.001) with reductions in anger, tension, confusion, depression, and fatigue. Vigor also decreased significantly (-8.70, p < 0.001). CHPQ scores negatively correlated with fatigue reduction (r = -0.493, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The CHPQ shows promising psychometric properties as a comprehensive measure of relationship-centered care. The paradoxical vigor decrease alongside reduced negative affect suggests complex emotional processing during therapeutic encounters. The correlation between CHPQ scores and fatigue reduction indicates that compassionate care may mitigate specific distress aspects in patients with persistent pain. Future research should explore longitudinal outcomes and incorporate qualitative methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.