ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
Snake markings facilitate diverse anti-predator functions depending on habitat and viewing angle.
Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Snake markings facilitate diverse anti-predator functions depending on habitat and viewing angle.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral EcologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animals employ diverse coloration strategies to reduce predation risk, with patterns playing a key role in camouflage or for signaling unprofitability. Snakes exhibit various markings, but the specific antipredator functions of these patterns remain debated. We investigated how different snake patterns interact with habitat background and predator viewing conditions to influence camouflage. Using artificial snake models with 4 patterns (uniform, stripe, spot, zigzag) and 2 body colors (brown, gray), we assessed detectability across different natural habitats in southwest UK. We used visual modeling to simulate mammalian and avian predators and quantified background matching and edge disruption across varying visual distance and angles. Our results show that patterns affect camouflage depending on habitat and observer perspective. Spot and zigzag patterns increased edge disruption, particularly at greater distances, while striped patterns provided less effective concealment. However, zigzag patterns increased the contrast of snakes with conspicuous coloration in open habitats, suggesting potential aposematism. Viewing angle significantly influenced camouflage, with higher angles breaking edge disruption of zigzag and spot patterns, which also decreases as an observer approaches. Our findings highlight the multifunctionality of varied snake patterns, demonstrating their ability to facilitate both crypsis and aposematism depending on the ecological context. These results emphasize the importance of integrating habitat, body color, and predator perspective in understanding antipredator adaptations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.