ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Transdiagnostic determinants of access to mental health care for youth with disabilities: a systems-oriented structured narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Children and young people with disabilities are at increased risk of emotional and behavioral difficulties and mental health problems, yet determinants shaping access to mental health care remain insufficiently understood. Methods: A structured search of PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus was conducted in March 2024. A total of 228 publications published between 1999 and 2024 were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify key determinants influencing access to mental health care. Results: Thematic analysis identified five cross-cutting dimensions, emerging inductively from the literature and informed by disability studies, child development, and health equity frameworks: (1) fragmented and poorly coordinated service systems; (2) barriers to accessibility and equity; (3) limited adequacy of care due to diagnostic overshadowing and training gaps; (4) restricted, often tokenistic participation of young people and families; and (5) stigma embedded within professional and structural practices. Conclusion: Findings highlight the need to move beyond deficit-oriented models toward a universal design for health care emphasizing participation, emotional safety, and continuity to reduce inequities, improve quality of life, and create equitable, sustainable care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.