ArticleWorld journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery2026
Deep Learning for Endoscopic Classification of Adenoid Hypertrophy.
Article in World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Endoscopy is a convenient and widely used method to evaluate adenoid size, but the subjectivity of its image diagnosis can result in over- or underestimation. To create a new assessment strategy for adenoid hypertrophy, we developed a reliable method for automated classification using a deep learning algorithm with nasal endoscopic images. Methods: Endoscopic images of adenoids were obtained from our institution and were divided into four grades based on choanal obstruction. The labeled images were randomly assigned to training and testing sets. The convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm Xception was used and tuned on the training set. The classification performance was assessed on the test data using the optimal model. Results: Twenty-six thousand and sixty endoscopic images of adenoids were included and classified into four grades (5500 for Grade Ⅰ, 5452 for Grade Ⅱ, 7453 for Grade Ⅲ, and 7655 for Grade Ⅳ). The Xception model achieved an overall classification accuracy of 95.53%. When evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs), the area under the curves (AUCs) of Grades Ⅰ- Ⅳ were 0.93, 0.94, 0.97, and 0.91, respectively. Conclusion: Artificial intelligence is effective in the classification of endoscopic adenoidal hypertrophy. The deep learning approach may be beneficial in improving the efficiency, objectivity, and stability of diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.