ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Validity and reliability of the persian adapted version of the labor pain relief attitude questionnaire for pregnant women (P-LPRAQ-p).
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLabor pain, as one of the inevitable pains among women, is generally tolerable for most women. The present study aimed to assess the cultural adaption and psychometric adequacy of the Labor Pain Relief Attitude Questionnaire (LPRAQ) for pregnant women. MATERIALS AND
methodThis psychometric study was conducted in four distinct phases. The first and second phases involved the forward-backward translation followed by necessary modifications, and the third phase focused on the content and face validity. In the fourth phase, construct validity (CV) and reliability were examined. CV was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and concurrent validity through previously validated and reliable measurement instruments. The mean LPRAQ-p scores were compared across different groups in terms of age, spouse's age, education level, planning for pregnancy, number of pregnancies and childbirths, depression and distress, history of analgesia use, and delivery mode. A higher P-LPRAQ score indicated a greater willingness to seek labor pain relief.
resultsA total of 355 pregnant women who sought medical care in Tehran during 2022 were studied. During the face and content validity assessment, all six items of the instrument were retained. CFA of six items with two factors showed a good model fit index (X
conclusionThe P-LPRAQ is a brief, concise, and straightforward questionnaire demonstrating optimal validity and reliability, making it a suitable tool for assessing pregnant women's attitudes toward labor pain relief.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.