ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Effectiveness of memory enhancement techniques vs. conventional teaching on schizophrenia for nursing students.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNursing students face several challenges in learning about schizophrenia, primarily due to the disorder's complexity. Additionally, limited hands-on clinical experience leaves students less equipped and lacking decision-making skills. The emotional strain of managing severe mental health issues adds anxiety and stress, further complicating their learning. The aim is to compare the effectiveness of memory enhancement techniques (MET) based teaching and conventional teaching regarding schizophrenia in terms of knowledge and decision-making ability among nursing students. MATERIALS AND
methodsA quasi-experimental study was conducted using a nonequivalent control group pre- and post-test design on 74 nursing students studying in the 6
resultsAt the end of the intervention, the post-test knowledge scores of nursing students in the MET group were significantly higher than the Conventional teaching group (
conclusionBoth teaching strategies were effective in enhancing the knowledge of nursing students regarding schizophrenia. However, MET-based teaching was more effective in enhancing the knowledge and decision-making ability of nursing students. The conventional teaching was found to be ineffective in improving the decision-making ability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.