ReviewJournal of education and health promotion2026
Effect of nurse informatics on medication errors, patients' satisfaction, and quality patient care - A systematic review and metanalysis.
Review in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital innovation has revolutionized healthcare, with information technologies addressing challenges faced by health care professionals. Nursing informatics aids nurses in decision-making by integrating information management and analytical sciences. The aim of the study was to assess the effect of nurse informatics on medication errors, patient satisfaction, and quality care. A systematic search of online databases was conducted from 2000 to 2024 for relevant RCTs and non-RCTs globally in English language. The population was nurses in hospitals; intervention was nurse informatics or electronic health records; comparators were standard nursing care; and outcomes were medication errors, patient satisfaction, and quality patient care. Data were analyzed by using PRISMA guidelines and RevMan 5.4 version software. Forest plot was used for all outcomes by considering substantial heterogeneity as I² > 50% at
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.