ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026
Design and psychometric evaluation of nurses' social health tool.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGiven the impact of nurses' social health on the quality of care, its evaluation is essential. To evaluate social health, we need a specific and appropriate tool. The aim of this study was to design and psychometrically evaluate a social health tool for nurses. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis exploratory mixed-method study was conducted in 2024 in Kashan, Iran. The initial version of the tool was designed based on a qualitative study. Face and content validity were assessed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. The construct validity of the tool was assessed using exploratory factor analysis on 300 nurses. Reliability was assessed through using internal consistency, stability, and ceiling and floor effects. The Keyes Social Health Scale was used to assess convergent validity. Eigenvalues > 1 and scree plot were used to extract the factors. Data were analyzed in SPSS version 26 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) using exploratory factor analysis, Cronbach's alpha, Pearson's alpha, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
resultsThe final form of the Nurses' Social Health Questionnaire had 47 items. Exploratory factor analysis identified six factors that were able to explain 48.445% of the total variance of the tool score. Cronbach's alpha and omega coefficients were 0.764 and 0.806, respectively. The ICC, standard error of measurement, and smallest detectable change coefficients were estimated to be 0.976, 3.767, and 5.379, respectively. The frequency of the minimum and maximum possible scores obtained by the tool was zero. There was no statistically significant relationship with the Keyes scale.
conclusionThe 47-item questionnaire was designed to be a valid and reliable tool for measuring the social health of nurses. The results of this study can be used for decision making and planning in the area of social health for nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.