Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205365›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2026

Comparison of the effect of standardized patient-based training and video-based training on the skill of measuring the level of consciousness among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial.

Sajad Zare Garizi, Faezeh Soltanian, Nazanin Sabagh Nezhad Yazd, Tannaz Faregh, Mostafa Javadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sajad Zare GariziChildren Growth Disorder Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Faezeh SoltanianStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Nazanin Sabagh Nezhad YazdStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Tannaz FareghStudent Research Committee, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mostafa JavadiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnsuring accurate assessment of patients' health is paramount in nursing interventions. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) plays a crucial role in evaluating patients' conditions and is deemed a fundamental clinical skill for nursing teams. However, errors in GCS assessment can significantly impact patient care, particularly as nursing students often lack sufficient training in assessing consciousness levels.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the effectiveness of standardized patient-based training and video-based training (VBT) on nursing students' ability to assess the level of consciousness. METHOD AND MATERIALS: This randomized controlled trial study included nursing students from the fourth semester in 2023. Seventy students were selected through convenience sampling and randomly allocated to two groups (

resultsThe mean score of the verbal response assessment in the standardized patient-assisted education group was 3.42 ± 0.84 and that in the video-based training (VBT) group was 2.85 ± 1.09, which was statistically significant (

conclusionTraining with standardized patients significantly improves nursing students' ability to assess consciousness levels compared to VBT. This approach aligns with health policy benchmarks by promoting safe, experiential learning methods, ultimately enhancing psychomotor skills while minimizing risks to real patients.

Indexed as

Consciousness disordersGlasgow coma scaleneurologic examinationsimulation trainingstandardized patient. video-based training

Identifiers

PMID42205365
PMCPMC13209971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.