ArticleCureus2026
Systems-Based Practice Core Competency: A Survey of Physicians' Perspectives.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystems-Based Practice (SBP) has been a core competency in the United States Graduate Medical Education (GME) since 1999, but little is known about physicians' attitudes toward and skills in SBP.
methodsThe aim of this study was to examine resident and GME faculty physicians' perceptions of their engagement, responsibility, and skills in SBP and opportunities to engage in SBP within the clinical workplace. A cross-sectional survey was conducted from May to June 2021 of 6,899 resident and GME faculty physicians across 10 health systems. The survey used Likert-scale questions to assess participants' perceptions across four domains, including engagement in SBP, responsibility for SBP, self-perceived SBP knowledge and skills, and affordances in the clinical environment to learn SBP.
resultsThe survey response rate was 21% (n=1,436). Most respondents were engaged in SBP and believed it was their responsibility to engage in SBP. The minority of respondents reported having adequate skills in several core SBP domains, including contributing to system-level improvements (n=576; 40.1%), addressing social determinants of health (n=530; 36.9%), and engaging in population health management (n=348; 24.2%). Organizational affordances had lower average scores.
conclusionsResident and GME faculty physicians seem to endorse a high degree of responsibility for and engagement in SBP while identifying substantial self-perceived skill deficits in SBP. Participants reported insufficient affordances in the clinical environment to develop several SBP sub-competencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.