Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42205356›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Primary care workforce structural inertia and Medicaid participation during the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020-2021.

Mandar Bodas, Qian Luo, Anushree Vichare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mandar BodasFitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4334-3308
Qian LuoFitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3413-9727
Anushree VichareFitzhugh Mullan Institute for Health Workforce Equity, Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0359-2833

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ensuring adequate participation of the primary care workforce in Medicaid is a persistent challenge for policymakers, yet the underlying clinician behaviors that sustain Medicaid patient access remain poorly understood. Methods: We examined linked Medicaid and commercial insurance claims volume data from 11 states between 2020 and 2021 to determine how patient volumes were distributed among the workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: We found that access to care was sustained by a dedicated core of anchor clinicians, representing 18% of the workforce, who consistently managed high patient volumes in every quarter. In contrast, about 33% of clinicians did not participate in the Medicaid program throughout the study period. Conclusion: These findings reveal that Medicaid participation reflects enduring practice patterns: clinicians tend to either consistently treat these patients or avoid the program altogether, rather than frequently changing their availability. To protect Medicaid patients' access against future economic or policy disruptions, state policymakers must move beyond simple clinician headcounts. We recommend designing targeted interventions to explicitly support and retain the critical anchor clinicians provide most of the care.

Indexed as

access to carehealth workforceMedicaidpayer mixsafety net

Identifiers

PMID42205356
PMCPMC13208905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.